Does Acute Hiv Rash Itch?

CHICHA INTERPRETATION OF ART. CRIMINAL CODE 59

See what has happened to a litigant. We have appropriated unlawfully charged a play statation that fails 400.00 soles. He is technical and the device led him to fix it. Failed in the due date. Le claimed. The one used by them as delivery. And in that roaming the victim and his family are looking for a technician. Was physically assaulted. Owner's family out of the Play Station and beat up the coach. And you know, these are the Commissioner and report it supposedly for aggravated robbery. First he had
denounced by misappropriation. Then the aggravated robbery and thrown in jail. He was later released on parole are in the process for aggravated robbery. The Court of Illicit Appropriation at sentencing to three years of deprivation of probation rules of conduct in accordance with Art. 57 of the Criminal Code. Here comes the problem. What drives me hives. happens that the sentenced hear his sentence and goes. And does not comply with the court submitted to justify their activities and therefore to sign the book of the PLC.
to normal here. What unsettles me is the proceeding of the judiciary. More precisely the Court clerk and Criminal Justice. Mind you, in collusion with the victim without being notified the proper and validly sentenced to be present in court and explain their non-attendance and sign the book, in accordance with inc. 1 of the article above Substantive admonished him. Then without having been notified in accordance with inc. 2 will extend the period of testing. And finally eat without having notified the LEGICIDIO validly in accordance with Articles 160 and 161 of the Civil Procedure Code compliance revoked the sentence. And orders the capture NATIONWIDE.
That, say you'll be fine? For me not masters of the Forum. Why? The secretary and the judge have acted biased and have been interpreted to chicha art. 59 of the Penal Code. The blessed secretary without the victim so requests in writing, it gives a reason to judge that sentenced is not complying with the rules of conduct. Wonder how long the clerks are so, so diligent? And the judge will have fulfilled its role as Director of Process as stated in art. 49 Code of Criminal Procedure?
What the judge is due to ordering and exhausted all possible means are met properly notify the sentencing. And do you go to his office and severely call attention not to go to court to sign the book of process control, and this care should be in ACTA. And not in the record. Happened. To set foot. Who here has made a tremendous descomonunal abuse and arbitrariness. How is it possible that this Judge has given a notification, if not stated in this notice has been received by any person, if not with scribbles on the back says it was left under the door.
ADMONISH With all due respect is to draw attention, and this must be done in the Office of the Judge. And do not say you are cautioned and also send him official notice that either never received the sentencing. Oh my God! is happening in the judiciary lately? If there are some judges inept, muscle-flexing and timid who do not know what they sign. And with misconduct damage, and destroy the humble people, poor but decent does not deserve to go to jail.
And what is more reprehensible is that the Criminal Division when the case went on appeal, yielding to the opinion void Prosecutor confirmed the decision of the Court which overturned the conditionality of Pena. And this despite the fact that he spoke and told the Voice that the Court Reporter of no evidence that the condemned has been notified to be validly submitted to the court to justify their activities, much less that no minutes of the warning.
is a pity that the judiciary now that plagued some judges who follow the arrow on the prosecutor. No review or study the dossier. Sometimes the wizard makes the decision and boom! sign it. What makes me cringe. And the Constitutional Court handle these cases by following a template out jurisprudence, also following the arrow. Clear as the fibula is poor and humble, not sounding surname, I give a damn that they remain in jail just like that, even for minor offenses. For crimes cookies. As in this case for a play station. That they should not be judicialized in criminal proceedings, if not civil proceedings for breach of contract, isn't it?
From here we demand that this trench to prevent further abuses committed in this issue of the rules of conduct, he admonished the defendant in person at the Office of the Judge. And if so despite ell fails then you have to apply the newly inc. 2 of art. 59 of Penal Code. Reason? JUSTICE BECAUSE THE JUDGE IN PERSON DIRECTLY TO WARN YOU IF YOU DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE RULES OF CONDUCT YOU GOING TO EXTEND THE PENALTY, AND STILL YOU BREACH THE COMPLIANCE REVOKED AND YOU go to jail. This is the correct, legal and human to comply with the rules of conduct.

What Does A Cake Stand Image Means

agree special code for young offenders

The Code of Children and Adolescents (CNA) will change by political agreement. There will be a section devoted to procedural aspects of the trials of minors. The ministers of the Court analyzed the performance of the judge in the case of El Pelon. "

"El Pelon". Ministers will consider the trial judge performance



The special committee on minority infringement of the Standing Committee today proposed several changes to the General Assembly to the ANC, after having collected suggestions from President of the Supreme Court of Justice (SCJ), Leslie Van Rompaey, and the Minister of the Family Court of Appeals, Ricardo Pérez Manrique.

The idea of \u200b\u200bdelegates of political parties is that due to "public alarm" that caused the case of referred child who murdered three people, adjustments are made to improve the ANC.

A document to be delivered today to the General Assembly, accompanied by a request from a month to a bicameral committee to prepare draft legislation to that effect, proposes to amend the time limit set as a limit for detention of a juvenile offender whose case is under consideration by the judge.



According to the idea of \u200b\u200blegislators, the document says it will incorporate a "safeguard clause" that can be used in a specially established by the judge to take two to four months total time deprivation of freedom while the process.

CNA The current rule states that the detention may not exceed sixty days and that after this period without issuing a sentence in the first instance the child must be released, that's what happened in the case of El Pelon "after the murders he committed.

TIME. Another change will be raised to overcome the "inconsistencies" says the document detected between provisions of the CNA on the established process and schedule. For example, Article 76 paragraphs one of whose mandates the final hearing to make final decision shall be within sixty days, but if the injunction is ordered to temporary internment of that child, the final hearing must be made within thirty days. Lawmakers raise

separation of a code infraction proceedings from the rest of the rules of the ANC.

justify this proposal, we suggest the need for the process is bounded in time, the definition of "reasonable time" beyond which detention becomes illegal, and the need to devise a new scheme procedure the possibility of a trial stage in which the defense can articulate against the prosecution's evidence it deems appropriate. Regarding the INAU

, other proposed changes to meet the deadlines prescribed psychosocial reports, without which the court can not decide.

In the case of "El Pelon" rose to the report later.

STUDY. On his first day of work after the Fair Judicial January, the justices of the Supreme Court of Justice (SCJ) resolved individually, who will analyze the performance of the judge who freed last December 30 to 17 year-old nicknamed " El Pelon, who hours after being released he committed his third murder.

fair judge of the Ciudad de la Costa, Juvenal Javier, ordered the release of teenager under the legal deadline of 60 days that the ANC expected to pass sentence in the case of juvenile offenders in detention. "With the report of the judge (Javier) it was decided that ministers make a simultaneous study of the case and then decide if you agree or not to initiate an administrative investigation" to the magistrate, said Van Rompaey to El Pais.

FOUR MONTHS. The SCJ president explained that the statutory period provided the ANC should be expanded to "exceptional circumstances" of particular gravity and complexity that does not allow the sentence is handed down in only 60 days.

"It is unreasonable within 60 days to issue sentence because it is too soon, because in some cases, if requested evidence it is impossible to meet, "said Van Rompaey.

Asked about the possibility of keeping criminal records of juvenile offenders once they reach adulthood, said "not legally influence" in the criminal judges' decision because for them are primary.


El Pais Digital

Infinite Repel In Ruby

17 policemen were relieved by rebel

EDUARDO DELGADO

The Interior Ministry ordered the relay and the start of summaries and 17 policemen " suspended their duties. "Pit-Cnt seeks to lower the profile of the incident and police unions have not agreed position.

Measurement committed by members of the Section 7 th meeting only essential activities (including the patrol), caught by surprise Wednesday at the Interior Ministry officials, the leadership of the Pit-Cnt and some of the police unions.

The reaction of the ministerial hierarchy was swift and harsh: "immediate relief of the officials involved; delivery uniform, gun and police ID card, they take minutes and start the corresponding summary."

In assembly, police from the sectional 7 th (Prado) discussed and questioned the wage situation, they consider unsatisfactory and decided to suspend the activities that were not essential to its function, said various sources consulted by El Pais.

During the afternoon yesterday, police chief attended the branch and spoke with officials who took the measurement. When

18, the Ministry's decision was already taken. A van with several troops of Task Force Preventive Patrol to the local police arrived to relieve the officials. In three trips, the 16 policemen who took the measure were taken to police headquarters.






Outside the faces were of concern among some police officers sectional own functions and were not members of the Police Union Montevideo (Sipom).

"With dignity!" Shouted one of them who departed in a vehicle driven. Another effective

Sectional 9 th also had to go to headquarters for adhering to the best of their comrades in the 7th.

People who were at the door of the branch joined other police union and the member of the Executive Secretariat of the Pit-Cnt Gustavo Signorello, who coordinates the trade union with the police unions. There

discussions and claims between police and union Signorello, who then joined the local branch to speak to the commissioner, deputy commissioner and staff who attended from Leadership.

At the exit, Signorello sought to lower the decibels of what happened, said there was no unemployment, but an assembly whose conduct was not communicated to the Ministry of Interior, as it should in this case.

mentioned that there were misunderstandings between the police and spoke of immaturity and lack of experience in the police unions, the result of a few years ago they formed. He added that the Pit-Cnt make representations to the Ministry to prevent the police to be punished and that his understanding is to meet the Federation of Police to discuss what happened.



"It's a complex, a series of misunderstanding and misuse of certain information, especially what happened. For example, in this branch there was no unemployment. Were assembled, "he said.

" End this because among other things is such misunderstanding of what happens in the police force. This is subject to discipline force, navy, so any small movement is then detected by appropriate agencies, and what happened here was that, "said the leader of the Pit-Cnt.

To Signorello, "there was no repression" of the Ministry, "is not met certain requirements that would allow the assembly will be held in the right way", as previously notified to the secretariat State, which "should be clarified to not take penalties with those fellows." He said the talks with the Ministry will be "starting with the decisions, because you can not make arrangements in case". "The move is not detected as the Ministry or someone sold it," he said.

Héctor Giménez, the assumptions, said the union does not support mobilized in the Section 7 th, because one of their leaders said they wanted no union. Instead, Jose Acuna, Sipom vice president, said that the Ministry's decision "was an exemplary implementation of political power, to see what will happen to them if they take further action. "

be free
The Montevideo police chief, Wilder Ferreira, told El Pais that the police moved to headquarters will be released after questioning. Ana Suarez, counsel for the Police union Montevideo, said he was not allowed to make contact with the police custody.


El Pais Digital