Thursday, September 17, 2009

Cheat On Pokemon Fire Red Gpsphone



Good!

I write today in the midst of a stormy night well completita: rain, thunder, lightning and all that, you know what it's all about. In any case here we are, taking it all for the blog, rain or snow, cold or heat. This week there have been major developments in my life, so I am going to save the opening paragraph ever.

Still, I have to use this blog to recommend a great invention of Google: Google Reader . It's great to read the headlines of the day at a time or to track all the blogs you please without having to open them all one after another. The truth is that the rule gives Google some fear and that they know everything we do on the net is as distrustful. But the truth is that with this the reader will have marked a point. Take a look and see what you think.

said, and to solace my (our) soul in such a night, what better than a good dose of civil rights III? Oh yeah! Talk Property today as well, with a capital. To see how I explain. In the world we have things and people. There is nothing in this state of nature to attribute certain things to certain people, but is rather through the right to assign an "owner" to things . The concept of ownership is therefore a law-making in Spain can be found in the Civil Code and llibre some of Codi Civil de Catalunya, with regard to the proper law of the land. I will not get to study the typical division between private and public property, including movable or immovable property, etc, etc because it would be a bit too, although the rules for each of these categories vary widely. A couple of strokes on the "content" of this right and ale, to bed.

This is useful to transcribe the first part of Article 348 CC, which is characterized, as so many articles of the code for its clarity and simplicity: " The property is the right to enjoy and dispose of a thing without other limitations than those established by law. "So if I'm the owner of a chair I can use it to sit, leave it to a friend or remove it (= fun) or I can sell it (= be). And the same with a house, a car, a pen or any other movable or immovable. However, since you see that the property right is not absolute and free of limitations, since it is subject to what the law says. That is, if the law says "you can not sit in your chair," it would be a limit to the property would have to comply. This law does not say, missing more, but does impose important constraints such as eminent domain. You have your land and all you want, but if all the requirements of the law of eminent domain your right of ownership over this area will become the mere right to receive fair compensation for the same in the public interest. It hurts, but it is. Best

leave the second part of Article 348 (the repossession) for another day, do you think?

comentaís to see if that seems impossible!

Health to you all.

Friday, September 11, 2009

How To Roll A Proper Neckerchief

property Diplomacy (I)

Hello, family.

How about going back to school? It is never easy returning from vacation, you know. And even less what to expect when the crisis on the one hand and other flu. Not to mention the ruling of the statute, Berlusconi's jokes and the ministers, the war in Afghanistan, health care reform in the United States and the visit of his friend Chavez. You have to see how well he paints the beginning of the year, right?

Pessimism aside, this course begins with a new stage in the life of whom I write and, by extension, in the life of this blog. Completed the law degree and the title under the arm throw me to study competitions, which as we all should know, are the tests done to work for the government, whether of the State, Autonomous Community and the town hall. And I'm not going to spend some opos either, no sir, v o to study nothing more, nothing less than to be diplomatic . And this just wanted to tell you today. I express only four reflections on the subject, since talking about diplomacy could spend hours and not plan.

1. The policy carried out by the government may be divided between domestic politics and policy abroad. The first is taking place between government and citizens of the country and which is mainly developed in its territory. The second is the one that has to do with relations between the state itself and the rest. Example of things first: pay taxes. Example of the latter: the bilateral summit nothing between Spain and Italy. That said, diplomacy or the diplomatic body is , within the ministry of foreign affairs, who is basically responsible for carrying out this "foreign policy" , in the same way that the tax charge to raise taxes.

2. Just as judges, prosecutors, notaries, police and tax inspectors are in the country, diplomats there are only two places: the Ministry (in Madrid) and embassies, consulates and missions (diplomatic) in the world (which are everywhere except in Spain, as you can appear.) This largely explains why I have decided to consider the opposition in Madrid where she is walking.

3. And I'll be saying: "All this is fine, but nobody here has told me what these diplomats." However, in the vernacular diplomats do three things, I write in order of importance: Organize cocktails and dinners in their homes and / or go to cocktail parties and dinners at the homes of other diplomats (the famous "dinner at ambassador's home"); represent the State of origin in the receiving State (ie, Ambassador Japan represents Spain in Spain to Japan, surprise!); and assist "their" citizens in the country. This last, perhaps most useful to us all, is the subject of a new advertising campaign of the Ministry, which IMHO is not bad. I recommend you to take a look here .

Anyway, I think with this and to know that the opposition come some 225 themes ranging from "The functions and purpose of private international law and regulatory techniques" to "Bases of economic dynamics: growth and development. Growth and structural development" , through "political and social developments in the Arab world. The peace process in Middle East", you can make some idea of \u200b\u200bwhere I'm getting into. In any case, know that we will return to this later, once you're more into the core.

Any questions you know.

A treatment!

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

How To Get Rid Of Eczema Scars

The good father


Hi everyone!

hope you've got all a good month of August. As regards to your narrator has been a quiet month compared with July, a month which as you know I spent in the ville des lumières , read Paris. I still stand little house, we were in San Lorenzo (Huesca) in Bailo (like any ordinary citizen, in summer you have to climb to the village), and the capital of the kingdom paving the way for September. And go into details later, for now is all a bit in the air, starts on track but the issue of opposition. I have already in mind a post to explain what I study and what I think served, but in any case it will be later.

Finally, as has already happened before, there have been several reasons why I have not updated the blog this month: the lack of access to internet, laziness and the fact that I have not touched anything that has to do with the law since I finished my Business Law exam IV (exchange law and bankruptcy, to be exact) were all relevant factors. However, yesterday I saw the light and now I throw one of the most important issues of civil rights: the right parent. I will try to keep the post short, we know that in August lazy as having to stay too long at the screen, above may be taking the sun or cane around.

In civil law speak of the diligence of the good father. " Two questions arise scathing comments: Who came up with this the "good father" and "What the hell you mean this? Respond first to the second question, if it seems good.

diligence and its opposite, negligence, are two key concepts in the law of contract and damages. As I look there are logical contracts are complied with (as the Romans said, pacta sunt servanda ). This does not mean, as you will understand, always met. When a contract is not fulfilled raises the question of who is to blame and who should pay for the breach of that contract. And this is where we will analyze the negligence or diligence of the person who has defaulted. Have you done what I needed to do or has not been careful enough? The general rule is that a person will only respond if you have committed fraud (in breach voluntarily) or negligence (not had the care they should have had). The case is clear, the coach is not valued in a vacuum, but need something to compare. And in Spain, to resolve this issue we say, "What would a good parent?"

What to me is the grace of good family (a part of that name, which has enough fabric) is that there is no exact definition of what a good father, so is a concept that varies depending on when content is interpreted. is, and in the nineteenth century could require that the good father to ride and knew he could not be required to know to use a computer, today would rather the reverse. What would make more sense to change this and use a criterion such as "the average citizen", you say? Yes, of course. But we have enough with what we have in this country to go up changing things that work fairly well.

remains to answer the second question, although I have been explaining and should be more or less responsive. We talk about the good father and not the average person because at the end of the nineteenth century when it drafted the current CC women cut no ice. Once again we see the importance of putting things in context.

And with this piece of article is inaugurated in 2009-2010 of the doctrine! What a year I expected, my mother ...

Take care! Soon more!